While I greatly
appreciate, respect and admire the bold efforts of wildland firefighters, the wildfire
situation in the West — at least here where I live in Montana — is greatly
misunderstood and more complex than most people realize. In many cases, past and
ongoing efforts to fight and suppress these fires have worsened the situation.
Our western
forests evolved with, adapted to and depend on fire; fire is essential to the
health of these forests. Different forest types evolved with various, differing
fire regimes. For example, our low-elevation ponderosa pine forests were shaped
by frequent, low-intensity natural fires that burned out the understory of
Douglas-fir and grand fir, recycled nutrients, and created and maintained
grassy pine savannas critical to deer, elk and other wildlife. The large pines
have thick bark that make them resistant to fire. Our high-elevation lodgepole
forests, on the other hand, evolved with and depend on less-frequent,
high-intensity, “stand-replacement” fires that recycle and renew the forests
every 100 years or so. (The serotinous cones of lodgepole require fire and
extreme heat to germinate.)
We have
drastically altered and disrupted the natural ecology of these forests. In the
low-elevation ponderosa pine forests, for example (where most towns,
communities and homes exist) past cattle grazing reduced the grasses, forbs and
other “fuels” that once carried the cleansing, low-intensity fires. The logging
and high-grading of large pines diminished the presence of fire-resistant
trees, and the suppression of fire allowed for an understory of thick firs to
replace what was once open pine savannas.
These thick,
dense forests have become weakened by the over-competition for sun, nutrients
and water (very limited in the arid West) — creating vast amounts of forests
that are now highly-susceptible to disease and insect attacks, such as mountain
pine beetles. Climate change — which has resulted in less snow, earlier snow
melt and more drought — has exacerbated the situation. We now have large
expanses of forests made up of dead and dying trees. The “prefect storm,” of
sorts, for the large, frequent, high-intensity fires we see today — fires that,
in some places, are larger and more intense than what naturally occurred.
It’s nature’s
seemingly harsh way of correcting our mistakes. Unfortunately, it can have
negative consequences for people.
Add to all this
the growing numbers of people moving to places like Montana and building
homes in these drastically-altered, fire-prone, fire-dependent forests. This is
akin to building homes in a flood plain. It’s not a matter of “if” the
wildfires will come — it’s a matter of “when” and “how big.”
In this new,
modern-day West most people have little understanding of forest ecology and the
risks and potential consequences of their actions and decisions. Manny refuse to
even take simple, common-sense precautions that can reduce the risks. A lot of folks want
to “keep” the forests around their homes “as they are” (not understanding the
dynamic, ever-changing nature of forests) and oppose science-based efforts to
thin forests, return low-intensity fires and restore forest health. The
situation has also made it difficult, if not impossible, to allow necessary
fires to burn.
So the Forest
Service, Bureau of Land Management, U.S. Park Service, U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service and other federal and state agencies spend an obscene amount of money —
and firefighters risk their lives — to save homes that have been built where
they shouldn’t be while keeping forests less-healthy and perpetuating the
problems.
What would really
help is to learn about forest ecology; support efforts to restore forests; stop
the development occurring in fire-prone, fire-adapted forests; make room for
and allow for some wildfires to burn, and require those who do live within
these forests to implement actions, such as thinning, to reduce the risk to
themselves and the brave firefighters who risk their lives fighting a perceived
“enemy” of our own making.
We need to learn to live among the forests we love while leaving room for the wildfires that sustain them.
We need to learn to live among the forests we love while leaving room for the wildfires that sustain them.
Great essay! Right on!!
ReplyDeleteI believe you meant exacerbated or perhaps you were exasperated....Good piece but I would add as long as we don't allow fire to do the job in the WUI (and that's really not an option adjacent to private land unless we want enormous lawsuits and settlements) we need to pick up the slack. And yes that means using chainsaws and equipment to reduce fuels even if the land is roadless. The Roaring lion fire changed intensity when it encountered stands on private ground that were thinned since the 2000 wake up call. I still prefer the sound of chainsaws carrying out thoughtful silviculture to air tankers and helicopters.
ReplyDeleteI say this as an advocate for allowing fire in Wilderness - but the WUI is not and should not be Wilderness.
Thank you for your comments Dave - good points. With your tremendous experience and knowledge, I value your opinion on such matters and would follow your lead -- even if it's exasperating! :-)
Delete